论文部分内容阅读
关于《经济学手稿(1857—1858年)》在马克思再生产理论形成史上的地位问题,学术界一直存在着不同意见。作者认为,把“资本一般”作单个资本理解、“社会资本”作许多资本理解,是对马克思有关论述的严重误解,并导致了对整个马克思再生产理论及其应用范围的误解。决不能根据某些论述认为马克思在《手稿》中还是完全接受了斯密教条、仍然停滞在斯密和李嘉图的认识水平上。实际上,在《手稿》中已形成了马克思对以后最终突破斯密教条具有非常重要意义的思想因素。但是,从《手稿》中尚不能得出马克思再生产理论已处于形成时期的结论。
With regard to the position of Economic Manuscripts (1857-1858) in the formation history of Marx's theory of reproduction, there are always different opinions in academia. The author believes that the “capital” as a single capital to understand, “social capital” for many capital understanding, is a serious misunderstanding of the Marxist exposition and led to a misunderstanding of the entire theory of Marxist reproduction and its scope of application. It can not be argued in any discourse that Marx still fully accepts Smiticorthe doctrine in the Manuscripts and still lags behind Smith and Ricardo's level of understanding. In fact, in the Manuscripts, Marx has formed the ideological factor that is of great significance to the final breakthrough of the Smith doctrine in the future. However, it is still impossible to draw a conclusion from the “manuscript” that Marx's theory of reproduction has been in its formative years.