中华书局点校本二十四史因具有权威性 ,受到广大文史工作者的喜爱。然而《明史·刑法志》在涉及明律关于诬告反坐的处理办法时 ,有一段文字竟有十多处标点存在着问题。其原因是整理者没有将所举的每一个例子看成是反映“已决”、“未决”两种情况 ,且这些规定根据的是“反坐剩罪”的处罚原则。 Zhonghua Bookstore School-based history of twenty-four because of its authority, by the majority of literary and art workers love. However, when it comes to the Ming Dynasty’s handling of false anti-sit-offs in the Ming and Ming Dynasties, there is a problem with more than a dozen punctuation marks in one passage. The reason for this is that the arrangers did not consider each of the examples cited as a reflection of the “decided” and “pending” cases, and these provisions are based on the principle of “anti-sit-in crime.”