论文部分内容阅读
1.不存在超越职能管辖的问题。被告人已以某罪由检察机关公诉至审判机关,即已进入了审判程序。审判机关在审判程序中,理应对被告人的全部犯罪事实和行为作全面的审理。这在《刑事诉讼法》第108条、第134条等条文中已作了较明确的规定,2、有公诉人、辩护人等直接参与法庭调查、辩证、宣判等审判全过程。对被告人的犯罪事实、证据等,各方除阅卷外又直接进行了面对面的调查、甄别,充分地发表了意见。合议庭在此基础上评议后作出的判决,完全符合《刑事诉讼法》第
1. There is no issue beyond the functional jurisdiction. The defendant has been prosecuted by a prosecutor for some crime to the judicial authority, which has already entered the trial. In the trial procedure, the judicial organ should handle all the facts and acts of the defendant in a comprehensive manner. This is more clearly stipulated in articles 108 and 134 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. There are public prosecutors and defenders who directly participate in the entire process of court investigation, dialectics and sentencing. The defendant’s criminal facts, evidence, etc., all parties in addition to reading the volume directly to conduct a face-to-face investigation, screening, fully expressed their views. The judgment made by the collegiate bench on the basis of this review fully complies with the “Criminal Procedure Law”