论文部分内容阅读
对消灭脊髓灰质炎强化免疫效果的调查、评价和考核是强化免疫的重要组成部分。如何用切实可行、简便有效的调查方法来客观地反映强化免疫情况,也是我们探索的主要问题。本文运用两种不同的调查方法对我市1995、1996年度消灭脊灰强化免疫效果进行了比较,表明第二种调查方法明显优于第一种调查方法,真实可信,简便易行,调查范围广泛,且节约人力、财力,适宜于基层卫生组织对行动范围广的防疫工作的调查和考核。
Surveillance, evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of polio eradication will be an important part of intensive immunization. How to objectively reflect the situation of intensified immunity with practical, simple and effective investigation methods is also the main issue we have explored. This article uses two different survey methods to compare the effect of poliovirus eradication in our city in 1995 and 1996, which shows that the second survey method is obviously better than the first survey method, which is true and reliable, simple and convenient, the scope of investigation Extensive, and save manpower, financial resources, suitable for grass-roots health organizations on a wide range of activities of epidemic prevention work of the investigation and assessment.