论文部分内容阅读
梅洛-庞蒂试图超越“知性政治”与“理性政治”的对立来追问历史的意义,一方面他认为历史是一种前对象的领域,另一方面他强调历史是一种先验的主体间性,对于他而言,历史的意义不是一劳永逸地形成的,而是实践与理论、实存与思想的层层无穷的转化,在这一过程中,历史的意义在于主体之间关系模式的确定,也可以说是在于主体之间不同视角的汇聚统一。跟随着梅洛-庞蒂的思考,我们发现了他跨越思想和实存界线的努力,他的历史理论因而超越了认识论,到达本体论的层面,这恰恰反映了他对现象学运动所作的贡献:突破早期胡塞尔的观念论气氛,走向一种存在现象学之路。
Mello-Ponty tries to go beyond the confrontation between “intellectual politics” and “rational politics” to question the meaning of history. On the one hand, he thinks that history is an area of former objects; on the other hand, he emphasizes that history is a kind of The transcendental intersubjectivity of transcendentalism means that for him, the meaning of history is not formed once and for all. It is an infinite transformation of practice and theory, existential reality and thought. In this process, historical significance lies in the subject The determination of the relationship between models can also be said that the convergence of different perspectives between the main unity. With the thinking of Merleau-Ponty, we find his efforts to cross the boundaries between thought and reality. His theory of history thus transcends epistemology and arrives on the level of ontology, which precisely reflects his contribution to the phenomenological movement : Breaking the Humorous Conceptualist Atmosphere of the Earlier Period and Moving Towards an Phenomenological Phenomenon.