论文部分内容阅读
《物权法》第231条规定:债权人留置的动产,应当与债权属于同一法律关系,但企业之间留置的除外。这里的但书正式确立了我国的商事留置权制度,显然法律明确将商事留置权制度的权利义务主体界定为了“企业”。其实“企业”一词在我国法学界历来就有颇多非议,此处商事留置权的主体亦被规定为企业,笔者不揣浅陋提出质疑。
Article 231 of the Property Law stipulates that movable property lodged by the creditor shall belong to the same legal relationship with the claim, except for the lien of the enterprise. But the book here formally established the commercial lien system in our country. Obviously the law explicitly defines the subject of the rights and obligations of the commercial lien system as “enterprise ”. In fact, the term “enterprise” has always had a lot of criticisms in the jurisprudence of our country. The subject of commercial lien here has also been stipulated as an enterprise. The author does not raise the question of humble opinion.