论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨综合护理干预对房颤射频消融治疗患者情绪的影响。方法选取我院心血管内科2012年5月-2015年5月收治确诊的114例房颤并行射频消融术的患者,采取随机数字表法将纳入研究的全体病例均分成对照组及观察组,每组各含病例57例。给予对照组患者术后常规性护理1周,观察组则在前者基础上合并综合护理1周,比较两组患者的事件影响量表(IES-R)评分、焦虑自评量表(SAS)评分和抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分。结果两组患者护理干预前SDS评分、SAS评分以及IES-R评分组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。护理干预后两组患者SDS评分、SAS评分以及IES-R评分较各自组干预前均降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组干预后SDS评分、SAS评分以及IES-R评分均较对照组降低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组干预后侵袭量表、回避量表以及高警觉量表评分较对照组评分均低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论综合护理干预能够有效改善房颤射频消融患者的情绪,具有较高的临床价值。
Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention on the mood of patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. Methods A total of 114 patients with concurrent atrial fibrillation (RFA) admitted to our hospital from May 2012 to May 2015 were selected and randomly divided into control group and observation group Each group contains 57 cases. Patients in the control group were treated for 1 week postoperatively, while those in the observation group were combined on the basis of the former for 1 week. The IES-R scores and SAS scores were compared between the two groups And Depression Self-rating Scale (SDS). Results There was no significant difference in SDS score, SAS score and IES-R score between two groups before nursing intervention (P> 0.05). After nursing intervention, SDS score, SAS score and IES-R score of the two groups were lower than those before the intervention in each group (P <0.05). The SDS score, SAS score and IES-R score Compared with the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05); scores of invasion scale, avoidance scale and high alertness scale were lower in the observation group than those in the control group (P <0.05) . Conclusion Comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively improve the mood of patients with radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation, which has high clinical value.