人们总以“有损媒体及读者利益”为由,责备“一稿多投”者。其实这种责备往往委屈了投稿者。其一,稿件只有“登”出来,才能成为现实的知识产品,才谈得上“有损”还是“有益”,而刊登大权掌握在媒体编者手中。一稿如果只是“多投”,而没有“多登”,何来“有损”之说?因此有问题也出在“多登”上。既如此,该打投者的板子,还是该打有稿件生杀之权的编者的板子?应是不难明白 People always blame “one manuscript more vote” on the grounds that “undermine the interests of the media and readers.” In fact, this kind of reproach often wronged contributors. First, the manuscript only “Deng” out in order to become a reality of knowledge products, just talk about the “loss” or “useful”, and publish the power in the hands of the media editor. If a manuscript is just “multi-vote”, but not “more boarding”, how to “detrimental” to say? Therefore, there are problems in the “Doden” on. It is not hard to understand that the board of the voter or the editor of the editor who has the power to kill or kill the manuscript