论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨更科学、客观地评定责任能力的方法。方法对１７２例刑事案例资料用ＳＡＳ软件包进行等级相关及逐步判别分析，筛选出对责任能力评定有关因素及有影响的判别因子。结果委托鉴定单位、思维形式障碍、妄想、幻听、情感障碍、复鉴诊断、年龄、案情、作案场所、工具、动机、幻视、个性异常、死亡人数、作案后表现、辨认能力、控制能力等因素与责任能力有关，而前６个因素及作案时间、意识障碍共８个因素为判别因子，建立了评定责任能力的判别方程，组内回代检验总正确率为７５９％。结论多元判别分析方法，有可能提供责任能力评定更科学的依据
Objective To explore a more scientific and objective way to assess responsibility. Methods A total of 172 cases of criminal cases were analyzed by rank-related and step-by-step discriminant analysis using SAS software package to screen out the relevant factors and their influential discriminant factors. Results Appraisal unit, thinking form obstacle, delusion, auditory hallucination, affective disorder, diagnosis of reexamination, age, case, location of crime, tools, motivation, visual hallucination, abnormal personality, number of deaths, performance after crime, ability to identify and control And other factors related to responsibility ability, while the first six factors and the time of committing the crime, a total of eight factors of disturbance of consciousness as a discriminant factor, the establishment of a judging ability of responsibility discrimination equation, the group within the test of the total accuracy of 75.9%. Conclusions Multiple discriminant analysis methods may provide a more scientific basis for assessing liability