日前,北京太平家园等业主委员会更换物业公司得不到政府部门“主动”的支持,业主不交物业费却被“被动”的法院“主动”执行。法院的被动性是司法性质所决定的。但被动的法院并不失主动性,无论是在案件的审判过程中,还是于判决的执行,司法都有很多主动的空间。而被动司法一旦主动则需要十分谨慎,朝阳法院的“强制执行式堵被窝”被 Recently, the Beijing Taiping Home and other owners of property replacement property companies without the government’s “active” support, the owners do not pay property costs were “passive” court “initiative” to implement. The court’s passivity is determined by the nature of the judiciary. However, the passive court does not lose the initiative. Whether in the trial of a case or the enforcement of judgments, the judiciary has many active spaces. Passive justice once the initiative needs to be very cautious, Chaoyang court’s “enforced blocking quilt” was