论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨再次剖宫产术的临床效果。方法:选取我院收治的28例再次剖宫产者作为临床研究对象,将其分为观察组和对照组,各14例,观察组产妇主要采用过下腹纵切口常规子宫下段剖宫产,对照组产妇采用新式剖宫产,对两组产妇的出血量、手术时间、开腹到胎儿出生时间以及腹腔粘连、子宫切口愈合情况进行对比。结果:再次剖宫产采用过下腹纵切口常规子宫下段剖宫产,腹腔粘连程度轻于新式剖宫产,且子宫切口愈合情况优于新式剖宫产。结论:如产妇选择再次剖腹产,适宜选择过下腹纵切口常规子宫下段剖宫产,临床效果较好。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of cesarean section again. Methods: 28 cases of cesarean section admitted to our hospital were selected as clinical study subjects, which were divided into observation group and control group, 14 cases in each group. The maternal group in the observation group mainly used cesarean section in the lower uterine segment of the lower abdominal longitudinal incision, Group maternal new cesarean section, the two groups of maternal blood loss, operation time, open to fetal birth time and abdominal adhesions, uterine incision healing compared. RESULTS: Cesarean section was performed again. Cesarean section was performed in the lower uterine segment of the lower abdominal incision. The degree of abdominal adhesions was lower than that of the new cesarean section. The healing of the uterine incision was better than that of the new cesarean section. Conclusion: If the mothers choose to take a cesarean section again, the cesarean section of the lower uterine segment of the lower abdominal incision should be choosed appropriately. The clinical effect is better.