因兼并了国营杭州罐头食品厂,以“小鱼吃大鱼”闻名遐迩的校办工厂——娃哈哈食品集团公司,在向全国市场顺利推进之际,今年6月,竟在南京败绩。 “娃哈哈”南京蒙难事件,经过有关部门的干预已经平息,但这场历时45天的风波已给“娃哈哈”集团造成了2000多万元的直接经济损失。“娃哈哈”在南京的被查禁,有没有根据呢?有的,那就是所谓的“GB11673—89含乳饮料标准”。然而,这个标准对“娃哈哈”却并不适用,因为后者是与该标准完全不同的新产品。以旧标准论新事物,类似这种奏“前朝曲”以致造成冤假错案的情况并非仅此一例,个中原因,的确引人深思。 Wahaha Food Group Co., Ltd., a school-run factory known for its “small fish and big fishes” merger with the state-owned Hangzhou Canned Food Factory, successfully advanced to the national market. In June this year, it defeated Nanjing. The “Wahaha” incident in Nanjing has been quelled after the intervention of the relevant departments. However, the storm which lasted for 45 days has caused direct economic losses of more than 20 million yuan to the Wahaha Group. “Wahaha” was banned in Nanjing. Is it based on it? Yes, it is the so-called “GB11673-89 milk drink standard.” However, this standard does not apply to “Wahaha” because the latter is a completely different new product from the standard. The use of old standards to discuss new things is similar to this kind of “preceding Chaoqu”, resulting in the creation of false positive and false cases. This is not the only case in which one of the reasons is indeed thought provoking.