论文部分内容阅读
木星在《山西广播电视大学学报》2012年第3期《版面费难题的破解呼唤评价机制、管理体制创新———关于学术刊物版面费问题论争的述评》一文中指出,学术界对版面费有两种截然不同的态度。持否定态度者认为学术期刊收取版面费危害严重,它催生学术腐败、影响学术诚信、助推学术虚假繁荣、情节严重者构成单位受贿罪。持肯定态度者认为学术期刊收取版面费合情合理合法,与学术腐败无关。对版
Jupiter in “Journal of Shanxi Radio and Television University,” 2012 the third period “layout fee problem crack calls for evaluation mechanism, management system innovation --- on academic journals layout fee debate” article pointed out that the academic fees for the layout Two completely different attitudes. Those who hold the negative attitude think academic journals charge a serious harm to the page fee, which promotes academic corruption, affects academic integrity, and promotes academic hypocrisy. In serious cases, a unit accepts bribes. Those who hold a positive attitude that the academic journals fee collection page layout reasonable and legitimate, has nothing to do with academic corruption. Right version