论文部分内容阅读
在中国经学史尤其是魏晋《论语》注释史上,江熙《论语集解》有着重要的地位。从经学史的角度说,何晏《论语集解》与江熙《论语集解》相比,前者主要为汉注的精粹集合,后者是两晋《论语》注的总结与汇集。它是在参考卫瓘、李充、孙绰与范宁等晋人《论语》注的基础上,根据己意筛选、编撰而成的。由于上述晋注在南朝时便大都散佚,因而江熙《论语集解》具有很高的史料价值。而就其中的江氏注文及其思想而言,江注充分体现了东晋的解经特色:不仅凸显了江熙个人作为东晋中后期经学家的儒学立场,而且透射出魏晋玄学思潮在《论语》诠释上的某些特点,其思想价值更不可忽视。
In the history of Chinese studies, especially the commentaries on the Analects of Confucius in the Wei and Jin Dynasties, Jiang Xi’s Analects of Confucius has an important position. From the perspective of history of science, He Yan’s Analects of Confucius is compared with Jiang Xi’s The Analects of Confucius. The former is mainly the quintessential collection of Han Dynasty, while the latter is the conclusion and collection of the Analects of Confucius in Jin Dynasty. It is based on the annotations of the Analects of Confucius written by Jin Wei, Li Chong, Sun Chuo and Fan Ning, according to what they wanted to screen and compose. Because of the above Jin Note most of the lost in the Southern Dynasties, so Jiang Xi “The Analects” has a very high historical value. As for Jiang’s annotation and his thought, Jiang Zhu fully embodies the characteristics of his study of the Jin dynasty: he not only highlights Jiang Xi’s Confucianism as the middle and late Eastern Jin Dynasty Confucianism, but also transmits the metaphysics in the Wei and Jin Dynasties in the Analects of Confucius "Some of the characteristics of the interpretation of its ideological value can not be ignored.