论文部分内容阅读
杜运燮《秋》的创作手法,对1979年习惯了固定、直白抒情方式的读者的艺术感受力提出了挑战。1980年8月号的《诗刊》发表了章明的责难文章《令人气闷的“朦胧”》。对《秋》提出尖锐质疑,说“十分晦涩、怪僻,叫人读了几遍也得不到一个明确的印象,似懂非懂,半懂不懂,甚至完全不懂,百思不得一解。”《秋》由此成为80年代初期“朦胧诗”命名的发轫之作。在轰轰烈烈的争论中,不少人发表文章指出此诗并不朦胧。九十年代,
Du Yunxie “autumn” creative approach to the 1979 accustomed to a fixed, straightforward way of lyrical readers artistic challenge posed. August 1980 issue of the “Poetry” published Zhang Ming censure article “boring” hazy “. ”Autumn“ raised sharp questions, saying ”very obscure, weird, people read a few times also do not get a clear impression, do not understand, half do not understand, do not even understand, baffled “Autumn” thus became the name of “Misty Poetry” in the early 1980s. In the vigorous debate, many people have published an article stating that this poem is not obscure. Nineties,