论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨宫腔镜下电切术与宫腔镜下刮宫术诊治异常子宫出血的临床疗效。方法 100例异常子宫出血患者,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组采用宫腔镜下刮宫术,观察组采用宫腔镜下电切术,对比分析两组患者的临床疗效。结果两组患者的病因检出率、手术时间、住院时间以及手术并发症情况,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。对照组患者的满意度为70%,观察组患者的满意度为98%,观察组患者的满意度显著优于对照组患者,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论采用宫腔镜下电切术与宫腔镜下刮宫术诊治异常子宫出血,两者疗效相当,但是宫腔镜下电切术疗效满意度显著高于对照组,具有临床价值意义,可以大力推广。
Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of hysteroscopic resection and hysteroscopic curettage in the treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding. Methods 100 patients with abnormal uterine bleeding were randomly divided into observation group and control group, 50 cases in each group. The control group underwent hysteroscopic curettage, the observation group underwent hysteroscopic resection, comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy of two groups of patients. Results There was no significant difference in the detection rate of the etiology, operation time, hospitalization time and operative complications between the two groups (P> 0.05). The satisfaction of patients in the control group was 70%, the satisfaction of the patients in the observation group was 98%, and the satisfaction of patients in the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Hysteroscopic resection and hysteroscopic curettage in diagnosis and treatment of abnormal uterine bleeding, the curative effect of the two are similar, but the effect of hysteroscopic resection was significantly higher than that of the control group, which has clinical significance and can be vigorously Promotion.