论文部分内容阅读
There is some disagreement in the published literature regarding the definition and the measurement of housing bubbles in China.Extending the analytical framework of Black et al. (2006),the present paper measures the housing bubbles of China’s 35 major cities from the second quarter of 1999 to the second quarter of 2010.The results indicate that the housing bubbles in China’s 35 major cities were relatively small in the sample interval,but the bubbles in eastern metropolises,such as Beijing,Shanghai,Shenzhen,Hangzhou and Ningbo,have been relatively big since 2005.The changing tendency of housing bubbles in most cities highly corresponds with the changes in real estate policies.This paper decomposes the housing bubbles of the 35 cities,and finds a great proportion ofirrational bubbles rather than rational intrinsic bubbles generated by price speculation.Based on empirical analysis, this paper proposes policy recommendations for preventing the generation and expansion of housing bubbles.
There is some disagreement in the published cases regarding the definition and the measurement of housing bubbles in China. Extensions the analytical framework of Black et al. (2006), the present paper measures the housing bubbles of China’s 35 major cities from the second quarter of 1999 to the second quarter of 2010.The results that indicate the housing bubbles in China’s 35 major cities were relatively small in the sample interval, but the bubbles in eastern metropolises, such as Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen, Hangzhou and Ningbo, have been relatively big since 2005.The changing tendency of housing bubbles in most cities highly responsive with the changes in real estate policies.This paper decomposes the housing bubbles of the 35 cities, and finds a great proportion of irrational bubbles rather than rational intrinsic bubbles generated by price speculation Based on empirical analysis, this paper proposes policy recommendations for preventing the generation and expansion of housing bubbles.