论文部分内容阅读
美国民主党与社会的关系表现为一种社会优位协商模式。无论是在总统选举中还是在日常的非选举政治中,就民主党与社会关系而言,职业化社团都处于相对优势的地位。美国社会优位协商的实质是职业化社团的优位协商。社会优位协商模式在美国的形成主要归结于美国政党的虚弱性、美国社会的强自组织性以及美国的总统内阁制等因素。这种社会优位协商模式有其优点,即其代表了一种多元主义的理念,符合现代民主政治的理解。然而,这种社会优位协商模式也不是普遍适用的。对于发展中国家而言,这种社会优位协商模式可能是需要慎重选择的。同时,在美国模式中表现出的职业化社团倾向也需要审慎看待。
The relationship between the U.S. Democrats and society is manifested as a model of social superiority. Whether in the presidential election or in routine non-election politics, professional associations are in a comparatively dominant position in terms of the relationship between the Democratic Party and the society. The essence of the good social negotiation in the United States is the negotiation of the superiority of the professional community. The formation of the social superiority consultation model in the United States mainly due to the weakness of the United States political parties, the strong self-organization of American society and the United States presidential cabinet system and other factors. This model of social superiority consultation has its merit, that is, it represents a concept of pluralism in line with the understanding of modern democratic politics. However, this model of social superiority consultation is not generally applicable. For developing countries, this model of social superiority consultation may need to be carefully chosen. At the same time, professional tendencies shown in the American model also need to be treated with caution.