论文部分内容阅读
所谓归谬法就是首先假定对方的错误论题是真实的,然后从这个论题中推出一个更为荒谬的结论,从而彻底地否定对方的观点。归谬法是司法论辩中常用的一种行之有效的反驳方法。在审讯罪犯或法庭辩论中,往往发挥出特殊的作用。 一、运用归谬法迫使犯罪分子认罪服法 在审讯犯罪分子的过程中,有些犯罪分子往往拒不交待自己的罪行,有的甚至百般狡辩,提出一些极其荒谬的理由为自己开脱罪责。在这种情况下,预审人员可以根据所掌握的材料,针对犯罪分子的荒谬的论点,运用归谬法予以反驳,迫使犯罪分子认罪服法。1955年8月,北京著名预审员汲潮接手审讯反动传教士王明道。王明道思想极端反动,解放后披着宗教的外衣,利用著书讲道的机会,恶毒攻击和破坏党的各项政策,并纠集一部分爪牙,公开反对党和政府,危害极大。在审讯中,王犯态度十分蛮横,居然把人民政府和国民党反动
The so-called return to absurdity method is to assume that the other side of the false thesis is true, and then from this topic to launch a more absurd conclusion, thus thoroughly denying each other’s point of view. Fallacy is an effective counter-argument in judiciary. Often play a special role in the trial of offenders or courtroom debates. I. Using Fallacy to Force Criminals to Confess their Faits In the process of interrogating criminals, some criminals often refuse to account for their crimes, and some even quibble for some extremely absurd reasons to exonerate themselves. Under such circumstances, the pre-trial personnel can refute the absurd argument of the criminals based on the materials they possess and refute the fallacy to force criminals to confess their sins. In August 1955, the well-known pre-trial scientist in Beijing took over the trial of reactionary missionary Wang Mingdao. Wang Mingdao’s ideology was extremely reactionary. After the liberation, he wore religious pretensions, used book preaching opportunities, viciously attacked and undermined the party’s policies, and gathered part of his minions to overthrow the opposition parties and government. At the trial, Wang committed a very rude attitude, actually turning the people’s government and the Kuomintang reactionary