论文部分内容阅读
我在学习‘教育学’第三章的過程中,曾经發生了不少的疑问,經過与别的同志漫谈討論互相研究的结果,有些疑問已经解决了,有些还正在解决中。这里我願意先提出以下问题来与大家討论,並希予以指正。现在上级正号召我們推行直觀教學,直观教学是不是麻烦呢?中国有一句老话:‘百闻不如一见’。應用在教学上来说,就是只用文字語言的講授,远不如應用實物教学有效。這恰恰合於凱洛夫教育学上所提出来的教学原则中的‘直觀原则’。所谓“直觀就是外界物体、现象、或是它們逼真的描繪(實在的或假定的),在我们感官前面的存在,這些物体和现象,通过学生底感覺能予意識以相當印象,並对於獲得的知识,奠定活的领悟之基礎。直观就是接触知识底‘最初源泉’”。(教育学一·三頁)
In the course of studying the third chapter of ’education’, I had a lot of questions. After talking with other comrades about the results of mutual research, some of the questions have been resolved and some are still being solved. Here I would like to put forward the following questions to discuss with you and hope to correct them. Now that our superiors are calling on us to implement intuitive teaching, isn’t intuition annoying? China has an old saying: “Bew is not good enough.” In terms of teaching, the use of language teaching is far less effective than the application of physical teaching. This coincides with the ’intuitive principle’ in the teaching principles proposed by Kalev’s pedagogy. The so-called “intuition is the external object, phenomenon, or their realistic depiction (real or hypothetical), the existence in front of our senses, these objects and phenomena, through the student’s bottom feeling can give a considerable impression of consciousness, and for obtaining The knowledge that lays the groundwork for a living understanding. Intuition is the ’original source of knowledge’ that comes into contact with the knowledge base.” (Educational One or Three Pages)