论文部分内容阅读
不久前,笔者所在的粤中菜市一个颇有政绩的青年干部在换届选举中落选了。据说,这次选举实行的是差额选举,十多个候选人中差掉一人。论政绩,论水平,论学历,论年龄,无论硬件软件,应当说,这位年轻干部都是佼佼者。可惟一的落选者恰恰就是他。事后有人指点说,那是因为他太“出众”的缘故。民主选举是个好东西,差额选举更是一种历史的进步,然而我们要警惕在某些不良的社会环境里,它可能发生某种变异。现在在一些青年干部中流行
Not long ago, a cadre of young cadres who performed quite well in the Cantonese-Chinese food and vegetable market where the author is located was unsuccessful in the general election. It is said that the election was conducted on a differential election, with one out of more than 10 candidates. On the performance, the level, on academic qualifications, on age, regardless of hardware and software, it should be said that the young cadres are outstanding. The only loser is him. Someone later pointed out that it is because he is too “outstanding ” sake. Democratically voting is a good thing. The election of the difference is even more a historical improvement. However, we must be wary of some possible mutation in some adverse social environments. Now popular among some young cadres