论文部分内容阅读
同济大学的朱大可教授在电视屏幕上犀利地批判《满城尽带黄金甲》,“有很多人说他好像走进了一个奶牛场,我们知道大众舆论有三个基本要素是最能吸引大众的,第一就是情色,第二是暴力,第三就是名人隐私……《满城尽带黄金甲》应该是说它同时具备这三个元素……”观众的追捧使得大量崇拜者涌现,是大众传媒制造偶像明星的神话又一次重演。现阶段的电影批评现象,主要表现为影评人明星化、偶像化,电影批评的大众化、娱乐化、商品化等特征。我们生活在一个商业大潮席卷全球的时代,商品化在人类文化与精神领域里的全面渗透是空前绝后的。哗众取宠、莫衷一是,是当前影视批评乃至整个文艺批评的共同现象。然而,电影批评对电影娱乐产业的正面影响力微乎其微,这与当前电影批评的滞后性不无关系。
Professor Zhu Dake from Tongji University sharply criticized “Curse of the Golden Flower” on the TV screen. “Many people said he seems to have walked into a dairy farm. We know that there are three basic elements of mass media that are the most attractive Volkswagen, the first is the erotic, the second is violence, the third is the privacy of celebrities ... ”Curse of the Golden Flower“ should be said that it also has these three elements ... ... ”The audience sought after a large number of worshipers emerged , Is the myth of mass media making idol star again. The phenomenon of film criticism at this stage is mainly characterized by the popularity of critic critics, idolization, popularization of film criticism, entertainment and commercialization. We live in an era when a commercial trend swept the globe. The full penetration of commercialization in the cultural and spiritual fields of mankind is unprecedented and unprecedented. The grandstanding, incomprehensible is the common phenomenon of the current film criticism and the entire literary criticism. However, the negative impact of film criticism on the movie entertainment industry is negligible, which is not unrelated to the current movie criticism lag.