论文部分内容阅读
目的了解广州市大、中学生对新型甲型H1N1流感知识的知晓情况以及预防甲型H1N1流感的良好习惯形成情况。方法采用分层整群随机抽样方法,抽取广州市4所学校共1000名学生,采用自行设计的问卷对其进行H1N1流感知识调查。结果广州市大、中学生对H1N1流感总体知识回答的正确率为55.76%,19～22岁组的学生为57.83%,其次23～28岁组为54.55%,15～18岁组为52.53%(F=13.304,P<0.001),三组间进一步两两比较,仅15～18岁组与19～22岁组间的差异有统计学意义(P<0.001);女生(56.62%)高于男生(54.29%)(t=-2.140,P=0.033);大学生(57.76%)高于高中生(51.88%)(t=-5.222,P<0.001)。对甲型H1N1流感基本知识回答的正确率为58.36%,三个年龄组间差异有统计学意义(F=6.761,P=0.001),三组间进一步两两比较,仅15～18岁组与19～22岁组间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.003);大学生高于高中生(t=-3.322,P=0.001)。对甲型H1N1流感预防与治疗知识回答的正确率为52.29%,三个年龄组间有统计学差异(F=13.538,P<0.001),三组间进一步两两比较,15～18岁组与19～22岁组和23～28岁组差异有统计学意义,后两组间差异无统计学意义;大学生高于高中生(t=-5.981,P<0.001);境外学生高于境内学生(t=-3.404,P=0.001)。结论广州市大、中学生对甲型H1N1流感基本知识以及预防与治疗知识的了解还不足,预防甲型H1N1流感的良好习惯形成率不高,学校应该加强对甲型H1N1流感知识的宣传教育。
Objective To understand the knowledge of new and high school students in A and H1N1 influenza in Guangzhou and the good habits of prevention of Influenza A (H1N1). Methods A stratified cluster random sampling method was used to extract 1000 students from 4 schools in Guangzhou City. H1N1 influenza knowledge survey was conducted using self-designed questionnaires. Results The correct answer to the general knowledge of H1N1 flu was 55.76% in Guangzhou and Shanghai middle school students, 57.83% in 19-22 age group, 54.55% in 23-28 year old group and 52.53% in 15-18 year old group (F = 13.304, P <0.001). There was a significant difference between the age group of 15-18 years and the age group of 19-22 years (P <0.001), and girls (56.62%) were higher than boys 54.29%) (t = -2.140, P = 0.033); college students (57.76%) were higher than high school students (51.88%) (t = -5.222, P <0.001). The correct answer to the basic knowledge of Influenza A (H1N1) was 58.36%. There was a significant difference between the three age groups (F = 6.761, P = 0.001) The difference between 19-22-year-old group was statistically significant (P = 0.003); college students were higher than those of high school students (t = -3.322, P = 0.001). The correct rate of response to the knowledge of prevention and treatment of Influenza A (H1N1) was 52.29%. There was a significant difference between the three age groups (F = 13.538, P <0.001) The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant; the level of college students was higher than that of high school students (t = -5.981, P <0.001); the number of overseas students was higher than that of domestic students t = -3.404, P = 0.001). Conclusion The knowledge of prevention and treatment of Influenza A (H1N1) and the prevention and treatment of Influenza A (H1N1) in Guangzhou are not enough. The rate of good habits in prevention of Influenza A (H1N1) is not high. Schools should strengthen the publicity and education of Influenza A (H1N1) knowledge.