论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析两种不同手术方式治疗尿结石的疗效。方法 60例尿结石患者随机分为对照组和观察组,各30例。对照组患者主要采用输尿管镜取石术治疗,观察组患者主要采用后腹腔镜手术治疗,观察两组患者的治疗效果。结果观察组治疗总有效率为93.33%,对照组治疗总有效率为70.00%,两组治疗效果相比差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组均未有并发症发生。结论后腹腔镜治疗尿结石效果显著,安全性高,值得临床推广使用。
Objective To compare and analyze the curative effect of two different surgical methods on urinary calculus. Methods Sixty urolithiasis patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group, with 30 cases in each group. Patients in the control group were mainly treated with ureteroscopic lithotripsy. The patients in the observation group were mainly treated with retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery and the therapeutic effects were observed in both groups. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.33%, while that of the control group was 70.00%. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P <0.05). No complications occurred in either group. Conclusions Retroperitoneal laparoscopic treatment of urinary stones is effective and safe, which is worthy of clinical promotion.