论文部分内容阅读
在篮球比赛中,判断“漏接”动作与两次运球违例一直是裁判员未能很好解决的问题。因为,从动作的外观形态上看,两者有相同之处,前者是规则允许的合法动作,后者是规则限制的非法动作。如何将两者清晰地、公正地区分开并掌握好判断的尺度呢?笔者略谈一点浅见。 关于“漏接”动作,1994～1998年篮球规则第38条第四款(下列情况不算运球)的第二条中这样写到:“在运球开始或结束时,队员偶然地失掉球,然后恢复控制球称为漏接。”作为临场裁判员,如果不能正确地判断“漏接”动作,将直接涉及到队员在运球前或运球结束后是否可再运球或两次运球违例的关键。
In the basketball game, to judge “missed” action and two dribble violations has been a problem that the referee failed to solve well. Because, from the appearance of the appearance of action, the two have the same place, the former is the law allows the legal action, which is the rule of the illegal actions. How to distinguish the two clearly and equitably and master the standard of judgment? With regard to the “missed” action, article 2, paragraph 38, of Rule 38 of the 1994-98 Basketball Rules (which is not considered to be a dribble) reads: “The player accidentally lost the ball at the beginning or the end of dribbling , And then restore the control of the ball known as the missed. ”As a referee, if you can not correctly determine the“ missed ”action, will be directly involved in the dribble before or after dribble players can be re-dribbling or two lucky The key to ball violations.