论文部分内容阅读
目的分析门诊电子处方干预效果。方法选取门诊电子处方干预前(2013年7—12月)和门诊电子处方干预后(2014年7—12月)本院每月门诊电子处方各400张,采用Excle表格逐项登记汇总,比较干预前后合理用药各项国际指标。结果 2014年7—12月本院每张电子处方用药平均品种数、电子处方每张用药平均金额少于2013年7—12月,门诊电子处方抗菌药物使用率、门诊电子处方注射剂使用率低于2013年7—12月,电子处方基本药物应用品种比例及金额比例高于2013年7—12月,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论本院门诊电子处方干预取得了一定效果,但仍需加大干预措施执行力度,探讨多元化改善措施,增强科室及管理者在合理用药中的责任心,全院同心协作,促进临床合理用药。
Objective To analyze the effect of outpatient electronic prescription intervention. Methods Before outpatient electronic prescription intervention (July-December 2013) and outpatient electronic prescription intervention (July-December 2014), 400 outpatient electronic prescriptions in our hospital were collected and summaried on a case-by-case basis and compared with interventions Before and after the rational use of various international indicators. Results From July to December 2014, the average number of drugs per prescription drug in our hospital was less than that for electronic prescriptions. The average amount of each prescription for electronic prescriptions was less than that of July-December 2013, the out-patient electronic prescription antibacterials utilization rate and outpatient electronic prescription injections were less than From July to December in 2013, the proportion and the proportion of essential drugs in electronic prescriptions were higher than those in July-December 2013, with significant differences (P <0.01). Conclusions The electronic prescription intervention in our hospital has achieved certain effect. However, we still need to intensify the implementation of interventions, explore diversified improvement measures and enhance the sense of responsibility of departments and managers in the rational use of medicines. The hospital should work together to promote rational drug use in clinical practice .