论文部分内容阅读
商标的作用在于区分商品来源,商标的价值在于使用,商标法的效果在于防止混淆。为此,商标法整体上构成一个完整的法律体系,在适用某一法条时,是孤立地、机械地适用,还是从商标法的体系性出发来适用?对这个问题的不同回答,体现出截然不同的司法理念。探路者商标案涉及的问题是:在先商标因权利主体已经消亡多年,本不会与在后商标相冲突,不存在混淆的可能性,此时如果机械地适用商标法第二十八条驳回在后商标申请,有悖商标法的立法本意。
The role of the mark is to distinguish the source of the goods, the value of the mark is to use, the effect of the Trademark Law is to prevent confusion. To this end, the trademark law as a whole constitutes a complete legal system, in the application of a law, is applied in isolation, mechanically, or from the system of trademark law to apply? Different answers to this question, reflecting Different jurisprudence The problem involved in the case of the Pathfinder trademark is that the earlier trademark has not been confused with a later trademark due to the disappearance of the subject of rights for many years and there is no possibility of confusion. At this time, if the trademark is mechanically applied in Article 28 The rejection of a later trademark application would violate the legislative intent of the trademark law.