论文部分内容阅读
目的比较国产和进口左氧氟沙星治疗细菌性感染的成本-效果。方法将208例随机分为两组,口服用药,A组:国产左氧氟沙星110例,B组:进口左氧氟沙星98例,用药物经济学方法进行成本-效果分析。结果A,B组治疗方案的痊愈率分别为79.1%、74.5%,有效率分别为92.7%、93.9%,A组的成本-效果比低于B组。结论治疗呼吸系统、泌尿系统的细菌性感染,国产左氧氟沙星和进口左氧氟沙星的临床疗效相似,但应用国产左氧氟沙星更合理、更经济,成本-效果比优于进口组。
Objective To compare the cost-effectiveness of domestic and imported levofloxacin in the treatment of bacterial infections. Methods 208 patients were randomly divided into two groups, oral administration, A group: domestic levofloxacin in 110 cases, B group: imported levofloxacin in 98 cases, the use of drug economics methods for cost-effectiveness analysis. Results The cure rates of A and B groups were 79.1% and 74.5%, respectively, and the effective rates were 92.7% and 93.9% respectively. The cost-effectiveness ratio of group A was lower than that of group B. Conclusions The clinical efficacy of domestic levofloxacin and imported levofloxacin is similar to the treatment of respiratory infections and urinary tract bacterial infections. However, the domestic levofloxacin is more rational, more economical and cost-effective than the imported ones.