论文部分内容阅读
随着国家法制的日臻完善,寄希望于行政处罚决定一锤定音很难,进行行政复议或行政诉讼程序的案件将呈上升趋势。2010年,在一起行政处罚案件中,本所就面临了有史以来第一起行政复议,这对我们提出了更高办案要求,我们必须立足充分客观的事实证据,适用法律准确,处罚主体和程序合法。本文简要介绍一起动物防疫行政处罚案件的案情及处罚经过,重点针对行政复议申请请求进行答辩,按照举证责任倒置的原则,对申请人的违法事实和行政处罚依据进行举证,逐一驳回其对本所作出的没收10头疑似染疫生猪无害化处理和罚款1.4万余元两项具体行政行为的复议请求,及要求对申请人给予8800元的国家赔偿复议请求。最终,本案以维持原行政处罚决定顺利结案。
With the improvement of the national legal system, it is hard to pin down the decision of the administrative punishment and the case of administrative reconsideration or administrative proceedings will be on the rise. In 2010, in a joint administrative penalty case, we faced the first ever administrative reconsideration in our history. This put forward a higher handling requirement for us. We must base ourselves on sufficient objective factual evidence, apply the law, and punish the subject and the legal procedures . This article briefly introduces the case of a case of animal sanitation and punishment after the punishment, focusing on the application for an administrative reconsideration reply, according to the principle of reversal of the burden of proof on the basis of the facts of the facts and administrative penalties of the applicant to testify, one by one rejected its made this Of the confiscation of 10 suspected piglets decontamination and fines 14,000 yuan two administrative reconsideration of the two requests for reconsideration and require the applicant to give 8,800 yuan national reconsideration request for compensation. In the end, the case was settled with the decision of maintaining the original administrative punishment.