论文部分内容阅读
《中华人民共和国档案法》第24条规定:“有下列行为之一的,根据情节轻重,给予行政处分,造成损失的,责令赔偿损失;构成犯罪的,依法追究刑事责任……有关国家行政管理机关并且可以给予行政处罚”。从立法规定上看,《档案法》所规定的行政处分、责令赔偿损失及刑事处罚这几种法律责任并不互相排斥,在一定条件下,档案执法机关或其他有关部门可以同时追究当事人两种或两种以上的法律责任。也就是说,在追究违法当事人的法律责任时,《档案法》允许档案部门或其他有关部门实行档案法津责任并用的原则。但目前的执法实践却存在着以行政处分代替赔偿损失、或以赔偿损失代替行政处分、或以行政处罚代替赔偿损失或行政处分的不符合《档案法》规定的作法,这种作法有悖于《档案法》的规定,于执法工作不利。为改变这种状况,有必要对档案法律
Article 24 of the “Archives Law of the People’s Republic of China” stipulates: “Anyone who commits one of the following acts shall, according to the severity of the case, impose administrative sanctions and cause losses, and shall be ordered to make compensation for the losses. If a crime is constituted, criminal liability shall be investigated in accordance with law ...... Relevant State Administration Organs and may impose administrative penalties. ” From the legislative point of view, the “File Act” provided for administrative sanctions, ordered the compensation for damages and criminal penalties these legal responsibilities are not mutually exclusive, under certain conditions, the file law enforcement agencies or other relevant departments can be held at the same time two parties Or two or more legal responsibilities. In other words, in investigating the legal liability of the party in breach of law, the “Archives Law” allows the archives department or other relevant departments to implement the principle of filing and legal responsibility. However, the present practice of law enforcement does not conform to the provisions of the “Archives Law” in the form of administrative punishment instead of compensation for damages, compensation for damages in lieu of administrative sanctions, or administrative damages instead of compensation for losses or administrative sanctions, The “Archives Law,” the provisions of law enforcement work adversely. To change this situation, it is necessary to document the law