论文部分内容阅读
日本政府为应对国际法院在2014年判决其在南极捕鲸的项目违反国际法,并在新捕鲸项目没有通过国际捕鲸委员会支持的情况下,于今年10月突然更新了接受国际法院强制管辖权的声明,将涉及海洋生物资源的争端排除在国际法院管辖权之外,置于1982年联合国海洋法公约争端解决条款之下。日本挑选法院的条款显然是为逃避国际法院的生效判决而做出,不仅引起国际舆论的声讨,也存在诸多效力瑕疵,更增加了管辖权的不确定因素,值得深入探讨。
In response to the decision of the International Court of Justice in 2014 that it whales projects in the Antarctic to violate international law, and in the absence of the new whaling project through the support of the International Whaling Commission, the Japanese Government abruptly updated its acceptance of the mandatory jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice in October this year , Excluding the dispute concerning living marine resources beyond the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice and placing it under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea dispute settlement clause. Japan’s appropriation of the court’s clause apparently was made to evade the International Court of Justice’s judgment of ruling. It not only denounces the international public opinion, but also has many flaws in its effectiveness, which adds to the uncertainty of jurisdiction and deserves further discussion.