评论、干预以及评论干预是叙事学研究的三个重要概念,但目前学术界在这三个概念的运用上存在模糊之处。干预除了评论这一实现途径外,还有其他多种实现途径,如引入潜在读者或叙述接受者。评论和干预虽然都存在显性和隐性之分,但二者的判断标准不一,前者以其解读是否需要借助文本内外的语境为标准,后者以叙述者是否打破故事进程为标准。评论干预是任何通过评论或解释实现的叙述者干预,其评论或解释的对象既可以是叙述内容,也可以是叙述形式。评论干预有显隐之分,隐性评论干预对于现代文学作品具有重要意义,应引起学界更多关注。 Commentary, intervention and comment intervention are three important concepts of narratology research. However, there are ambiguities in the application of these three concepts in academia at present. In addition to commenting on this route of intervention, there are many other ways in which interventions can be introduced, such as the introduction of potential readers or narrative recipients. Although there are both explicit and implicit comments and interventions, the two have different standards of judgment. The former takes its interpretation of the context of the text as the standard and the latter as the standard of whether the narrator breaks the story or not. Commentary Intervention is any narrator’s intervention by comment or explanation, whose object of commentary or explanation can be narrative content or narrative form. There are obvious subtleties in the comment intervention. The implicit comment intervention is of great significance to modern literary works and should attract more attention from the academic circles.