论文部分内容阅读
清代纂修《明史》不仅是中国史学史上一件重要的事情,也是中外史学交流史上一件值得注意的事件。朝鲜十分重视清朝对自己祖先及其史实的评判。因为,《明会典》以及明代诸多野史对于朝鲜宗系、李成桂立国、仁祖登极等事情之误载,使得朝鲜担心清修《明史》会以讹传讹,故而在整个《明史》纂修过程中多次派遣使者前往北京辩诬,最终使得清廷之明史馆采纳了他们的意见。
Compiling “Ming Dynasty” in the Qing Dynasty is not only an important issue in the history of Chinese historiography, but also a noteworthy event in the history of the exchange of Chinese and Western historiography. North Korea attaches great importance to the Qing dynasty’s judgment on its ancestors and its historical facts. This is because the “Ming Hui Dian” and the many unofficial history of the Ming dynasty were responsible for the fact that the North Koreans, Li Chenggui and the Rwandese Deng dynasty were unjustly loaded. As a result, the DPRK worried that purging the “Ming Dynasty” would be corrupted by repeated mistakes. Therefore, during the process of compiling the “Ming History” Dispatching messengers to Beijing for many times to defame and eventually make the Ming court of Qing Dynasty adopt their opinions.