当苏联、东欧发生剧变并大规模推行“私有化”以后,当中国国有企业的亏损面、亏损额有增无减、深化改革进展不大的时候,一些人由改革开放之初姓“社”姓“资”的争论,转到今天姓“公”姓“私”的争论,这是一种正常的现象。本文想从马克思有关生产关系要适应生产力发展这一基本原理出发,通过回顾原苏联和我国实行公有制的历程,来分析研究所有制的双重属性,以探索我国公有制的实现形式。 When the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe underwent drastic changes and implemented “privatization” on a large scale, when the losses and losses of Chinese state-owned enterprises increased unabated and the progress in deepening the reform was modest, It is a normal phenomenon that the debate over surnamed “capital” should go to the debate about the “public” surname “private” surname today. Based on Marx’s basic principle that production relations should adapt to the development of productive forces, this article tries to analyze and study the dual attributes of ownership by reviewing the history of public ownership in the former Soviet Union and our country to explore the realization form of public ownership in our country.