论文部分内容阅读
认知确证的内在主义与外在主义之争是当代知识论中最重要的争论之一。内在主义者借特鲁特普案例的思想实验来反驳外在主义的可靠主义,被普遍看作是对外在主义确证理论的一个深刻而又重大的挑战。实验哲学的奠基之作《规范性与认知直觉》通过问卷调查对特鲁特普案例的思想实验提出了质疑,认为普遍大众对特鲁特普案例的直觉是不稳定的,并进而质疑认知直觉在哲学论证的合适性。我们以中国大学生为受试者,对特鲁特普案例进行问卷调查,通过分析,我们主张:普遍大众的直觉是稳定的;内在主义的确证理论比外在主义的确证理论更合理。
One of the most important arguments in contemporary epistemology is the dispute between internalization and extroversion of cognitive confirmation. The internalists who refute the externist secu- rityism through the experiments of Trutti’s case are generally regarded as a profound and significant challenge to the extrinsic confirmation theory. The cornerstone of experimental philosophy, Normative and Cognitive Intuition, questioned the Truth in Truth through a questionnaire survey, believing that the general public was not intuitive about the Trüder example and questioned further The Appropriateness of Knowing Intuition in Philosophical Argumentation. We take Chinese college students as subjects and conduct a questionnaire survey on the case of Trutop. Through analysis, we hold the opinion that the general public’s intuition is stable, and the intrinsic corroboration theory is more reasonable than the extrinsic positive corroboration theory.