论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨MEBT/MEBO技术对小儿Ⅱ度烧伤的临床疗效。方法:将烧伤440例患儿随机分为观察组和对照组,各220例。观察组患儿接受MEBT/MEBO技术治疗,对照组接受常规治疗。比较两组患儿创面愈合情况及治疗期间创面感染的发生率等。结果:观察组患儿痊愈后的瘢痕面积[为(11.4±6.1)%TBSA(总体表面积)]、创面愈合时间[(22.4±8.2)d]、瘢痕发生率(3.6%)及患儿创面植皮例数(15例)均低于对照组[分别为(21.2±7.5)%TBSA、(35.7±10.3)d、瘢痕发生率19.1%、42例及87例],两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患儿治疗后21例出现创面感染(9.5%),低于对照组(57例,25.9%)(χ2=5.621,P<0.05)。结论:MEBT/MEBO技术能够较好地改善小儿烧伤创面愈合情况,减少局部感染的发生率,值得临床推广应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of MEBT / MEBO in treating second degree burn in children. Methods: 440 children with burn were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 220 cases each. The observation group received MEBT / MEBO treatment and the control group received conventional treatment. The wound healing of the two groups was compared with the incidence of wound infection during the treatment. Results: The scar area [(11.4 ± 6.1)% TBSA], wound healing time [(22.4 ± 8.2) d], scar formation rate (3.6%) and skin grafting The number of cases (15 cases) were lower than that of the control group (21.2 ± 7.5% TBSA, 35.7 ± 10.3 days, 19.1%, 42 cases and 87 cases). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups Significance (P <0.05). In the observation group, wound infection was found in 21 cases (9.5%) after treatment, which was lower than that in the control group (57 cases, 25.9%) (χ2 = 5.621, P <0.05). Conclusion: MEBT / MEBO can improve the wound healing in children and reduce the incidence of local infection, which is worthy of clinical application.