论文部分内容阅读
维尔诺等后马克思主义学者在把马克思《资本论》中关于自动机器体系、一般智力等论述歪曲建立在技术史观的基础上,一方面单向度地把马克思关于社会生活过程受一般智力所控制的观点引向对当代资本主义条件下生命政治问题的论述,另一方面又批评马克思关于资本主义必然灭亡的结论是不着实际的观点。他们的这种阐述是建立在对马克思关于一般智力的观点的片面理解基础上。马克思从固定资本的物质存在形式和社会存在形式双重视角出发来解读自动机器体系这种固定资本的社会历史内涵及意义的观点,是与其历史唯物主义的基本思路完全一致的。
Vernano and other post-Marxist scholars put Marx’s “capital theory” on the automatic machine system, general intelligence and other discourses on the basis of the history of technology, on the one hand, unilaterally put Marx on social life process by the general intelligence The view of control leads to an account of life and politics under the conditions of contemporary capitalism, on the other hand, it criticizes Marx’s view that the conclusion of the inevitable death of capitalism is not realistic. Their formulation is based on a one-sided understanding of Marx’s view of general intelligence. Marx’s viewpoint of interpreting the automatic machine system as the connotation and meaning of social capital of fixed capital from the dual perspective of material existence and social existence of fixed capital is completely consistent with the basic idea of historical materialism.