沪上首例涉网约车保险合同理赔纠纷案判决,法院认为原告以他人名义用非营运性质的车辆从事营运活动的行为属被告商业险免赔范围,故驳回原告诉讼请求。私家车网约载客,发生事故后保险公司是否可以拒赔?近日,浦东新区人民法院对这起财产保险合同纠纷作出一审宣判,驳回了原告李先生的诉讼请求。这是沪上首例判决的涉网约车保险合同理赔 In Shanghai, the first case of a dispute over the claims for the dispute over contractual claims for damages in the contract of insurance of motor vehicles was taken. The court held that the plaintiffs dismissed the claims of the plaintiff because the defendant did not engage in commercial activities with the non-operating vehicles in the name of others. Private car network about carrying passengers, insurance companies can refuse to pay after the accident? Recently, the Pudong New District People’s Court made a first instance verdict on this property insurance contract dispute, dismissed the plaintiff Lee’s claim. This is the first case in Shanghai involving network car insurance contract claims