论文部分内容阅读
目的:对火针治疗慢性胃炎的临床随机或半随机对照试验研究进行文献质量评价.方法:计算机检索相关数据库,并辅以手工检索.纳入随机或半随机对照试验.按照Cochrane系统评价员手册进行质量评估,对同质性研究进行Meta分析,并对系统结果进行GRADE分级.结果:共纳入8篇随机对照试验,火针组与针刺组比较,纳入3个研究,在有效率方面,有统计学意义[RR=1.14,95％CI(1.04,1.25)],火针组优于针刺组. GRADE分级为中级.结论:从目前的临床报道来看,火针治疗慢性胃炎有一定疗效,但仍需更优证据支持.“,”Objective:To evaluate the literature quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs chronic gastritis treated with fire needle. Methods:The related databases were searched by computer and assisted by manual retrieval to get the literature of RCTs or quasi-RCTs. The quality evaluation was carried out according to the Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 4.2.8, and the metaanalysis was carried out on the homogeneity and the GRADE classification of the system results was carried out. Results:Eight RCTs were included, in which there were 3 studies on comparing fire needle with the acupuncture. In terms of efficiency, there was statistical significance [RR=1.14, 95％CI(1.04, 1.25)], indicating that acupuncture group was better than the acupuncture group. GRADE was classified as intermediate. Conclusion:From the clinical reports recently, chronic gastritis treated with fire needles showed certain effect, but more reports are needed to further prove it.