论文部分内容阅读
……得知贵刊正向Nature级杂志努力,很受鼓舞,同时也冒昧进一言,不知可否。 两次出国归来,深感国内做科研除了经费、信息不足外,还有一些说不明道不白的地方。时常看到一些闪光火花因争议较大而无处发表,只得转投国外的情况。 Nature上Letter to ditor的方式可否借鉴一下,办一个学术争鸣专栏。每隔一期或不定期刊登一些争议较大的文章,亦可加编者按说明争议焦点所在、文责自负。但如发英文则应有国际有关专家审阅。这样既不至遗漏创新性观点又不至谬误流传,或可使贵刊更加生动活泼。
... I am encouraged to learn that your magazine is working on Nature magazine. Returned twice abroad, deeply aware of the domestic scientific research in addition to funding, lack of information, there are still some do not know where the road is not white. Often see some flash spark due to controversy and nowhere to publish, had to switch to foreign situations. Nature on Letter to ditor way can learn from, to do a column of academic contention. Every issue or irregular publication of some controversial articles, you can also add Editor’s note according to the focus of the dispute, the text at your own responsibility. However, if English should be reviewed by relevant international experts. This will not miss the innovative point of view and not to the fallacy spread, or make your magazine more lively.