论文部分内容阅读
本刊在2009年第2期刊登的《美国双射程/双任务导弹的发展》一文中,对美国双射程/双任务导弹技术的发展历程进行了介绍。后收到读者反馈,认为双射程导弹技术难度过大,成本过高,实用效率反而不如现有近程空空导弹和中远程空空导弹的组合。对于这种观点,《美国双射程/双任务导弹的发展》的第一作者中航光电所高劲松博士并不认同,他又向本刊投来了《美国双射程/双任务导弹评述》一文,从不同层面对双射程/双任务导弹的发展进行了更全面的回顾,解释了其一度没有引起关注的原因,与具备部分双射程能力的法国“米卡”导弹进行了对比,并提出了双射程导弹的全寿命费用低于现有空空导弹的观点。
The article published in the second issue of 2009, “the United States double-range / dual-mission missile development,” a article on the United States dual / dual-mission missile technology course of development is described. After receiving the reader’s feedback, that the dual-range missile technology is too difficult, the cost is too high, practical efficiency but not as good as the existing short-range air-to-air missiles and long-range air-to-air missile portfolio. To this view, Dr. Gao Jinsong, the first author of the development of the U.S. dual-range / dual-mission missiles, disagreed with Gao Jinsong, who again submitted a paper entitled “US dual-range / dual-mission missile review” A more comprehensive review of the development of dual-range / dual-mission missiles at different levels explains why they were once unattractive and contrasted with the French-Mika missiles with partial dual-range capabilities and proposed The full life cost of dual-range missiles is lower than that of existing air-to-air missiles.