论文部分内容阅读
目的调查和分析城市社区人群使用全民健身路径器材进行身体活动的现状及其影响因素,为政府管理部门制定群体身体活动促进工作政策及采取相关措施提供科学依据。方法在北京、杭州、成都三地抽取有代表性的社区,在社区内或社区附近路径器材摆放地点对正在使用“路径”器材的18岁以上的居民随机进行问卷调查。采用EpiData3.1软件建立数据库。使用SPSS13.0版本进行数据清洗和描述性统计分析、单因素分析。结果 77.5%的调查对象本着强身健体的目的使用路径器材进行锻炼。47.5%的调查对象坚持每天使用路径器材进行锻炼。调查对象每周使用路径器材进行锻炼的次数平均为(6.61±5.37)次,每次锻炼时间为(30.79±20.81)min,调查对象使用路径器材进行锻炼的历史平均达到(19.35±21.47)月。中老年组调查对象的锻炼情况优于青年组,文化程度低的调查对象的锻炼优于文化程度高的居民。结论社区居民使用路径器材强身健体意识很强,目前影响路径工程使用情况的因素包括锻炼者的性别、年龄、职业和文化程度。在推广路径器材的使用过程中要考虑到上述因素的差异,针对青年、女性、老年人或在职人员研发创新性的策略动员社区各类人群积极参与锻炼,从而提升群体身体活动水平。
Objective To investigate and analyze the status quo and influencing factors of physical activity of people using fitness route in urban community and to provide scientific basis for government departments to formulate policies and measures to promote physical activity of group physical activity. Methods A representative community was drawn from three locations in Beijing, Hangzhou and Chengdu, and questionnaire surveys were conducted among residents above 18 years of age who were using “Path ” equipment in the community or in the vicinity of the community. Using EpiData3.1 software to establish a database. Using SPSS version 13.0 for data cleaning and descriptive statistical analysis, univariate analysis. Results 77.5% of the respondents used physical pathways to exercise. 47.5% of the respondents insisted on daily use of path equipment for exercise. The average number of times the subjects used the path equipment to exercise was (6.61 ± 5.37) times per week, and each exercise time was (30.79 ± 20.81) min. The historical average of the subjects who exercised with the path equipment reached (19.35 ± 21.47) months. The middle-aged and elderly groups were better than the youth group in their training, and the subjects with lower education level outperformed the residents with higher education level. Conclusion Community residents have a strong sense of physical fitness using path equipment. The current factors affecting the use of path engineering include the gender, age, occupation and education level of exercisers. We should take into account the differences in the above factors in the promotion of path equipment, and develop innovative strategies for young people, women, the elderly or serving staff to mobilize various types of people in the community to actively participate in physical exercise so as to enhance their physical activity level.