论文部分内容阅读
中国的红卫兵在文化大革命中出版了一大批毛的未发表过的著作,然而其中并没有《矛盾论》和《实践论》解放前的版本,这就引起了一部分人的怀疑。他们怀疑这两篇文章是否在1937年写的,对于把毛作为一个哲学家持批评态度最激烈的阿图尔·柯亨在1964年就宣称:这两篇著作实际上是在1950年时写成的。因此,中国把这两篇著作说成是1937年写的,“看起来是一种欺骗”。都林和哥拉斯也对中国的说法持怀疑态度。他们认为,中国官方之所以要在这两篇文章完成的日期上作假,目的是要把毛说成在延安时期就已经是一个马克思主义理论家了。然而施
China's Red Guards published a large number of unpublished works of Mao during the Cultural Revolution. However, there were no pre-liberation versions of “contradictions” and “practices”, which aroused the suspicion of some people. They doubt whether the two articles were written in 1937 and Artur Cohen, the most critical of Mao's criticism as a philosopher, declared in 1964 that the two books were actually written in 1950 . Therefore, China has said these two books were written in 1937, and “looks like a deception.” Both Turin and Glasz are also skeptical of China's claims. They think that the reason why Chinese officials should make a false declaration on the date of completion of these two articles is to say that Mao was already a Marxist theorist during the Yan'an period. However, Shi