论文部分内容阅读
犯罪评价体系作为法官的思维工具,既应符合理论逻辑,又须与刑法典一致。就澳门刑法典而言,应注意主观解释与客观解释的差异。其体系为:行为—不法—罪过。行为是构成要件前的独立阶层,而非构成要件要素;构成要件合致性与违法性合并为不法阶层,更适合澳门刑法立法现状;在罪过(罪责)阶层,可归责性(责任能力)是责任基础,修改归责制度时应注意与原立法协调。澳门刑法典一些用语并不科学,在分析犯罪评价体系时应加以甄别。
Criminal evaluation system as a judge’s thinking tool, it should not only meet the theoretical logic, but also with the Penal Code. For the purposes of the Macau Penal Code, attention should be paid to the differences between subjective and objective explanations. The system is: behavior - unscrupulous - sin. Behavior is the independent stratum before constitutional requirements, not the elements of the constitutional requirements. The combination of constitutionality and illegality constitutes an illegitimate class, which is more suitable for the status quo of the legislation of the criminal law in Macao. In the class of sin (culpability), responsibility (responsibility) is Basis of responsibility, revision of the system of blame should pay attention to coordination with the original legislation. Some terms of the Macau Penal Code are unscientific and should be screened when analyzing the crime evaluation system.