论文部分内容阅读
自刘俊文先生提出中国国家图书馆善本部所藏周字51号文书为《开元职方格》残卷以来,学术界长期将这一观点奉为通说。但比对文书内容与形式并分析唐代相关史实可知,该文书只是开元时期西州都督府辖区的一件下行牒文书,并非唐格。将这件文书从唐格残卷中剔除,有助于进一步确认唐格的编修体例、特征及性质,推动唐格的复原和研究工作。
Since the speech made by Mr. Liu Junwen at No. 51 in the Zhou Zongzi of the Rare Books Department of the National Library of China as a fictional block of the “Kaiyuan New Year”, academics have long regarded this as a general statement. However, comparing the content and form of the document and analyzing the relevant historical facts in the Tang Dynasty shows that this document is only a descending document of the Dutianyu Western Capital Prefecture in the Kaiyuan Period and is not a Tanggong document. Excluding this instrument from the Tange can help to further confirm Tange’s editing system, characteristics and nature, and promote Tange’s restoration and research work.