一名担任长沙市人大代表的律师在风险代理一起合同纠纷案件时,因诉讼费问题和委托人发生争议,竟然将委托人委托其接受的全部案款悉数“留置”。在多次催要未果的情况下,委托人以涉嫌侵占罪为由将律师告上法庭。然而,由于律师的人大代表的特殊身份,案件却又陷入了遥遥无期的审理之中。这起自诉案件在当地产生了强烈的反响,引发了人们对人大代表拘捕、审判程序的普遍质 A lawyer who acted as a representative of the Changsha Municipal People’s Congress, acting as a contractual dispute agent in the risk-averse case, dispatched the client to entrust all the cases accepted by him due to a dispute over litigation costs and the principal. In the case of many unsuccessful attempts, the client brought the lawyer to court on suspicion of embezzlement. However, due to the special status of lawyers’ NPC deputies, the cases have been caught in the foreseeable future. This case of private prosecution had a strong reaction on the ground, triggering a general quality of arrest and trial of people’s congress deputies