论文部分内容阅读
自淅川下寺春秋楚墓的简报发表以来,在我国考古与历史学界引起了很大的反响,不少学者撰写了论文,对这批墓葬的有关学术问题提出了不同的看法,特别是对第三组二号墓的墓主进行了激烈的争论。一种意见同意简报作者的看法。认为二号墓的墓主是令尹子庚;第二种意见则认为应该是楚叔之孙佣,即文献中记载的(艹为)子冯;第三种意见,也认为二号墓的墓主是楚叔之孙倗,但这个“倗”不应是令尹(艹为)子冯,而应该是令尹子庚之孙。本文着重从墓葬本身的情况,对该批墓葬的时代、墓主再作进一步的探讨。
Since the publication of the briefing on the Spring and Autumn Chu tomb of Xichuan Temple, it has aroused great repercussions in the archeology and history of our country. Many scholars have written essays and put forward different views on the academic issues concerning these tombs. In particular, Tomb of the three groups of two tomb fierce controversy. One opinion agrees with the authors of the briefing. The tomb owner of No. 2 Tomb was ordered to make Tom YEng Geng; the second opinion was that he should be a Sun Yat-sen’s commissioner, that is, the son Von Feng recorded in the literature. The third opinion also believed that the tomb owner Is Chu Sun’s grandchildren, but this “倗” should not make Yin (艹 for) son von, but should be to make Yoshiko Geng grandchildren. This article focuses on the situation of the tombs themselves, and further examines the time of the tombs and the tomb owners.