论文部分内容阅读
探讨文章阅读过程中文章标记量的多少对文章中不同类型的信号保持的影响。结果表明 ,在有标记的目标句上 ,少标记条件显著优于多标记条件和无标记条件 ,多标记条件与无标记条件之间无显著差异 ;在无标记的目标句上 ,无标记条件显著优于多标记条件和少标记条件 ,多标记条件与少标记条件之间无显著差异。这一结果支持在文章阅读过程中读者是微略性地运用文章标记的假设和交易效应的假设。
The article discusses how much the amount of article mark in the reading process affects the different types of signal preservation in the article. The results show that there is no significant difference between the multi-label and non-label conditions on the labeled target sentence, and the unlabeled condition is significantly better than the unmarked one There was no significant difference between multi-labeling conditions and less labeling conditions than multi-labeling conditions and few labeling conditions. This result supports the reader’s assumption of the article’s tagging assumptions and transaction effects in the article reading process.