论文部分内容阅读
[案情]2002年4月10日,赵某和两名同伙一起窜至江苏省南京市。当晚,赵某独自溜出所住宾馆,过了一个多小时才回来。赵某出门时身上没有带钱,回来后当着同伙面数钱,并声称在饭店里偷了2万元。当天晚上,当地公发机关只有两起失窃的报案材料,分别称在饭店里就餐时被人偷去现金4000元、8000元。第二天中午,赵某又窜至江苏省常州市某餐厅盗窃作案未成,在准备离开时被餐厅保安人员抓获,当场搜出赃款2000 元。法院在审理此案时,最终认定赵某盗窃了2000元,对另外的2万元没有作为盗窃数额认定。[评析]法院对赵某盗窃数额的认定是有道理的,另外的2万元
[Case] April 10, 2002, Zhao Mou and two associates fled to Nanjing, Jiangsu Province. That night, Zhao alone slipped out of the hotel, after an hour to come back. Zhao did not go out with the money when the back, back in front of a number of partners in the face, and claimed stole in the hotel 20,000 yuan. That night, the local public authority only two theft of the reported material, respectively, said the restaurant was stolen when dining 4,000 yuan in cash, 8,000 yuan. The next day at noon, Zhao Mouzou also flee to a restaurant in Changzhou, Jiangsu Province, theft did not become ready to leave when seized by the restaurant security staff found on the spot stolen money 2,000 yuan. When the court tried the case, Zhao eventually found Zhao stealing 2,000 yuan and did not recognize the other 20,000 yuan as theft amount. [Comment] Zhao court the amount of theft is justified, the other 20,000 yuan