论文部分内容阅读
阿尔都塞是恩格斯历史合力论最尖锐的诘难者,与其他带有政治色彩的诘难所不同的是,阿尔都塞的诘难具有相当的理论深度。其核心论点是恩格斯历史合力论是对马克思唯物史观的倒退,具有非马克思主义的性质。合力在本质上是无意识的、历史合力论陷入了认识论的真空、历史合力论与资产阶级意识形态的出发点相一致等便是阿尔都塞对这一核心论点的具体展开。割裂历史合力论与马克思唯物史观之间的紧密联系,视历史合力论为唯物史观之外的新的历史观理论是阿尔都塞诘难的症结所在,其从根本上说是站不住脚的,必须予以驳斥。针对阿尔都塞的诘难,反思历史合力论当下所面对的解释困境,实为当务之急。
Althusser, one of the sharpest victims of Engels’s historical alliances, is different from other politically charged tribes in that Althusser’s fallacy has a considerable theoretical depth. Its core argument is that Engels’ historical synergy is a retrogression on Marx’s historical materialism and non-Marxist. Collaboration is essentially unconscious; the historical synergy is trapped in the vacuum of epistemology; and Althusser’s concrete expansion of this core argument is in accordance with the historical synergy and the starting point of bourgeois ideology. The close connection between the theory of severing the historical combination of forces and the historical materialism of Marxism and the new theory of historical outlook that considers the historical combination of forces as the historical materialism are the crux of Althusser’s hardship and are fundamentally untenable Must be refuted. In view of Althusser’s frustration, it is imperative to reflect on the current dilemma of historical cohesion.